"if they think Trump is for it, they are AGAINST it. Religiously."
Exactly. It's incredible how well this ploy has worked. This may be the main reason they keep offering us two candidates that are horrible and loathsome (to at least half the population). The voter keeps supporting the less-loathsome globalist shill.
I'm optimistic. This issue is really separating the wheat from the chaff. Reality will exert its influence on all those who fail to accept hard truths, it is just a function of time. I only lament the fact that we have to deal with the consequences of delusions we aren't responsible for. Forgiveness and mercy for these folks is warranted, as none of us are immune from the pull of delusion, but I do think it is appropriate to keep track of what peoples judgement is worth.
"if they think Trump is for it, they are AGAINST it. Religiously."
Exactly. It's incredible how well this ploy has worked. This may be the main reason they keep offering us two candidates that are horrible and loathsome (to at least half the population). The voter keeps supporting the less-loathsome globalist shill.
Incidentally, you're supposed to establish your "I'm not anti-vax" street cred at the beginning of the article, not the end: https://shumway.substack.com/p/4-im-not-an-anti-vaxxer-nkay?s=w
I'm optimistic. This issue is really separating the wheat from the chaff. Reality will exert its influence on all those who fail to accept hard truths, it is just a function of time. I only lament the fact that we have to deal with the consequences of delusions we aren't responsible for. Forgiveness and mercy for these folks is warranted, as none of us are immune from the pull of delusion, but I do think it is appropriate to keep track of what peoples judgement is worth.