This post evaluates the Pentagon Fact Sheet (PFS) based on established scholarship, generally reliable media sources, and prior DoD statements. It also provides historical context for the PFS.
The Pentagon Fact Sheet on the Ukrainian Biolabs- A Closer Examination
The Pentagon Fact Sheet on the Ukrainian Biolabs: A Closer Examination
I find it a shame it missed the very relevant issue:
National security must be considered as from each nation position, and not how it may suit politicians. Seeking specifically Caucasian Russians DNA without their knowledge and consent hardly can be considered for their interest and wellbeing but rather a secret war conduct.
Video: -وثائقي الميادين فيروسات دبلوماسية - النسخة الانجليزية (Re USA bioweapons)
(see page 2 of the document)
This I view proves beyond any shred of a doubt that the bioweapons laboratories funded by the USA in Georgia and Ukraine were not for peaceful self-protection issue but were to pursue to develop a bioweapon to kill of Russians and so Ukraine Caucasian Russians residing also in Ukraine (Donbass), etc. and Ukraine actually was using drones for this purpose. This alone I view was sufficient casus belli for the Russian Federation to commence its action as I understand already such drone activity had been used into Russia Federation.
Regretfully this critical issues was in my view overlooked. I state this even so I value the article.
Thank you. I will likely carefully examine that concern and related allegations in a future post.
One of my points above and elsewhere is that proving the bioweapons program charge is highly difficult under the existing treaty. I do not have the hard verified evidence that would do so. You believe it exists, and you provided a source link to some of it -- I do thank you for link, and I will examine the source document.
But on my end, I believe that I can show -- can prove to skeptical people -- that the pathogen collections derived directly from the former Soviet Union bioweapons program were real and present, and should NOT have been there. Why?
Because the Ukrainian facilities did NOT meet recognized biosafety and biosecurity standards, and so the continued existence of these pathogen collections presented a real, highly dangerous, and unnecessary threat to the people of Ukraine and the people of the region.
I concluded a more recent article with the following:
**
"Rather than destroying the legacy of the former Soviet Union bioweapons program in Ukraine, the [American] DTRA for whatever reasons has helped the Ukrainian government perpetuate and even risk proliferating that bioterrorism threat."
"Prior to the Russian invasion, Ukraine did not lack a shortage of disparate political parties — some engaged in outright civil and at times violent strife. Ukraine also did (does) not lack militias, members of which have professed extreme ideological agendas. Nor does Ukraine exist in a region free from greater conflicts; rather, Ukraine exists in a region permeated by state and non-state actors of dubious intent."
**
So the need for biosecurity is real. But for the labs in question, the USA and Ukraine were NOT meeting recognized biosafety and biosecurity standards.
I honestly believe that charge will stick -- if only I could get my fellow Americans to take notice of it.
But I am not going to make a charge that I do not believe will stick -- even if I were to suspect or even have good reason to believe much more was/is going on. You can call my position cowardly if you like. I understand it more as responsibility.
Having carefully read the article
https://americanexile.substack.com/p/the-pentagon-fact-sheet-on-the-ukrainian
The Pentagon Fact Sheet on the Ukrainian Biolabs- A Closer Examination
The Pentagon Fact Sheet on the Ukrainian Biolabs: A Closer Examination
I find it a shame it missed the very relevant issue:
National security must be considered as from each nation position, and not how it may suit politicians. Seeking specifically Caucasian Russians DNA without their knowledge and consent hardly can be considered for their interest and wellbeing but rather a secret war conduct.
You may download the document from:
https://www.scribd.com/document/566634435/20220326-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-R-Kershaw-Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-59-Australia-s-Security-Issues
Video: -وثائقي الميادين فيروسات دبلوماسية - النسخة الانجليزية (Re USA bioweapons)
(see page 2 of the document)
This I view proves beyond any shred of a doubt that the bioweapons laboratories funded by the USA in Georgia and Ukraine were not for peaceful self-protection issue but were to pursue to develop a bioweapon to kill of Russians and so Ukraine Caucasian Russians residing also in Ukraine (Donbass), etc. and Ukraine actually was using drones for this purpose. This alone I view was sufficient casus belli for the Russian Federation to commence its action as I understand already such drone activity had been used into Russia Federation.
Regretfully this critical issues was in my view overlooked. I state this even so I value the article.
Thank you. I will likely carefully examine that concern and related allegations in a future post.
One of my points above and elsewhere is that proving the bioweapons program charge is highly difficult under the existing treaty. I do not have the hard verified evidence that would do so. You believe it exists, and you provided a source link to some of it -- I do thank you for link, and I will examine the source document.
But on my end, I believe that I can show -- can prove to skeptical people -- that the pathogen collections derived directly from the former Soviet Union bioweapons program were real and present, and should NOT have been there. Why?
Because the Ukrainian facilities did NOT meet recognized biosafety and biosecurity standards, and so the continued existence of these pathogen collections presented a real, highly dangerous, and unnecessary threat to the people of Ukraine and the people of the region.
I concluded a more recent article with the following:
**
"Rather than destroying the legacy of the former Soviet Union bioweapons program in Ukraine, the [American] DTRA for whatever reasons has helped the Ukrainian government perpetuate and even risk proliferating that bioterrorism threat."
**
https://americanexile.substack.com/p/two-more-pentagon-statements-on-the
I also pointed out:
**
"Prior to the Russian invasion, Ukraine did not lack a shortage of disparate political parties — some engaged in outright civil and at times violent strife. Ukraine also did (does) not lack militias, members of which have professed extreme ideological agendas. Nor does Ukraine exist in a region free from greater conflicts; rather, Ukraine exists in a region permeated by state and non-state actors of dubious intent."
**
So the need for biosecurity is real. But for the labs in question, the USA and Ukraine were NOT meeting recognized biosafety and biosecurity standards.
I honestly believe that charge will stick -- if only I could get my fellow Americans to take notice of it.
But I am not going to make a charge that I do not believe will stick -- even if I were to suspect or even have good reason to believe much more was/is going on. You can call my position cowardly if you like. I understand it more as responsibility.
Thank you for your visit to American Exile.